Timetable for Merit and Special Reviews

RIs and librarians should put together the formal documentation which will be used in the review. This should include:

1. RI's recommendation (Comments prepared by persons at higher levels of supervision (e.g. division heads, department heads, Assistant/Associate University Librarians (AULs)) may be included in the academic review file.)
2. Librarian's signed self-evaluation
3. A current CV
4. Carefully chosen copies of reports, articles and books which the candidate has authored or edited and other documentation which the candidate believes may be of assistance in the evaluation
5. Additional letters of support: additional letters of support are appropriate for greater than standard, off-cycle, career status, and promotion reviews. Mid-level or higher Librarian-rank candidates may choose to include such letters in their merit review files, but they are not required and should only be included if they provide substantial additional evidence not already present in the dossier. Candidates wishing to include such letters should give names to their RI, who can request letters from anyone but is expected to request a reasonable number from the list supplied by candidate; you can also indicate individuals who might not provide objective assessments of your work. Those should be provided to the review initiator by December 4, 2024.